Why this campaign?

Our mission is to end the tax-avoidance practices relating to commercial voids by closing the loophole in the law that allows unscrupulous (or ignorant) landlords to avoid paying business rates… at great cost to local councils and to communities.

Here are the three primary reasons why we’re doing this…


End Unscrupulous Practices

To bring an end to the various unscrupulous practices relating to commercial voids that are draining councils of around £300 million p.a

Gather Support

To gather the maximum support for this initiative – amongst MPs, councillors and others – so that the Government takes the necessary action.

Promote an Ethical Solution

To promote an ethical solution to commercial voids that has widespread approval for how it benefits charities, landlords and local communities.

Background

What led to this campaign?

In 2023 we successfully campaigned to make ‘box shifting’ less viable, supported by over 100 MP & counsellor signatories.

Now we need to go further… to expand our focus to quash ALL forms of unethical ‘empty rates avoidance’ that are draining our councils and damaging our communities.

In a nutshell…

In this short video we answer a few key questions, including:

  • WHY ARE WE DOING THIS?
  • WHAT UNETHICAL PRACTICES DO WE NEED TO STOP?
  • WHAT ARE THEY COSTING OUR COMMUNITIES?
  • WHAT CAN BE DONE? AND BY WHOM?

We invite you to share this short video far and wide.

The timeline so far

2008 – Law change marks the end of indefinite property rate relief

This made commercial landlords more exposed to paying rates relief when properties became empty.

2014/18 – Emergence of unethical schemes

Exploiting the loophole in the law, different rates-avoiding schemes emerged – including box shifting.

2021/22 – Law changes in Wales

By extending the period before exemption, this made various unethical schemes less viable.

2023/24 – Law changes in Scotland

By granting discretionary powers to councils, exemption was restricted to deserving genuine cases.

2023 – Ban Box Shifting campaign launched

In a bid to quash this scheme that was draining councils and damaging communities throughout England.

2023/24 – 100+ MPs & councillors onboard

The Ban Box Shifting campaign secures the support of 100+ MPs & councillors; all were signatories to an open letter to government.

Apr ’24 – Law change in England

The Government announced an extension to the empty property relief reset period, making box-shifting a less viable option.

2024/25 – A rise in other unethical schemes

With the loophole still open, there is an increase in various unethical schemes – including snail farms, & fake places of worship – which continue to cost councils and impact communities.

2026 – E.R.A. campaign is launched

In a bid to close the costly legal loophole, and help bring about a robust rates system that is fair, effective and fit for purpose.

While the Government’s Consultation on Business Rates ends on February 18th, we will continue campaigning after that date.

Together we believe we can move beyond isolated fixes and bring into being a robust business rates that incentivises commercial landlords to play fair – and STOP making choices that drain our councils and damage our communities.


PRESS COVERAGE

Making Headlines

Explore the media coverage and recognition we’ve garnered in the short time since our campaign launched. Dive into articles and papers from major news outlets and publications that have spotlighted our campaign.

FINANCE DIGEST

Business Rates Reform: A Sustainable Path

As the UK Government and local councils face growing financial pressure, higher business rates—particularly on sectors like hospitality—are increasingly being discussed. However, raising rates risks further burdening businesses while much of the Government’s £4.3bn business rates support is concentrated among large organisations, while pubs receive relatively modest relief that offers little meaningful support.

Financial times logo
FINANCIAL TIMES

Letter: Big retailers’ food inflation complaints miss the point

Recent articles highlight the pressure major supermarkets are placing on the government over proposed business rates increases.

But to suggest this is a straightforward concern about food inflation misses the broader context.


UK NEWS GROUP

A Harrow foodbank’s imminent homelessness as local leaders call for urgent action on business rates reform

The potential closure of a local youth charity’s foodbank  showcases the mounting pressures facing local charities and organisations as rising costs and a broken business rates system threaten the survival of essential community services.

UK NEWS GROUP

Business rates reform is not just about tax – it is about for who the system is built

As we look out over 2026, one uncomfortable truth is becoming harder to ignore. Business rates are no longer just a blunt instrument of taxation.

They have evolved into a complex system that increasingly rewards scale, legal and illegal firepower, and technical expertise, while quietly sidelining those in the middle without the resources to navigate it, nor small enough to be regarded as worthy of support.

THE ECONOMIST

A slimy scheme to avoid property tax

Unlike their French neighbours, Britons tend to be sniffy about eating snails. But there is a new fad involving the delectable gastropods that Brits do have a taste for: tax avoidance.

PROPERTY WEEK

Business rates reform must go further

The current system penalises businesses that expand and distort landlord decision-making. A smoothing out of these thresholds is overdue. But as the industry looks ahead to the Budget, it is vital that reform goes much further.

BBC

‘Bogus’ snail farms set up to avoid business rates

Boxes of snails have been found in central London offices by council officers investigating tax avoidance schemes.

THE GUARDIAN

Ye of little faith? The tax loophole that turns old pubs into places of worship

A complex corporate network is enabling big landlords to avoid business rates by claiming religious exemption – and costing cash-strapped councils millions. 

PROPERTY REPORTER

New empty rates relief policy is just the start to save our local councils and high streets

On 1 April 2024, the previous Government amended England’s empty property relief (EPR) laws to tackle business rates avoidance and evasion, following a consultation in late 2023.

PROPERTY REPORTER

As commercial properties are turned into snail farms, changes to empty property legislation can go further

Effective from 1 April 2024, the Government has made a long-awaited change in legislation to England’s Empty Property Relief (EPR) reset period for commercial properties, from six to thirteen weeks

New Business Logo
NEW BUSINESS

Our communities need saving from the threat of box shifting

What does it say about our country when our second biggest city, and one set to have one of the fastest growing economies across the nation in 2023, declares bankruptcy?

Financial times logo
FINANCIAL TIMES

Letter: Here’s one tax loophole English councils must close

The answer lies in extending the occupation period required before being able to claim rates relief, from six weeks to six months

THE TIMES

Close empty property business rates relief loophole, say MPs

More than 30 MPs are calling for the government to tackle business rates avoidance in England by banning controversial “ box shifting” methods.

COSTAR

MPs Urge Government to Target ‘Box-Shifting’ Landlords Avoiding Business Rates

More than 30 MPs have urged government to reform business rates avoidance in England by banning so-called “box shifting”.

LOCALGOV

Tired of empty shops? It’s time to ban box shifting

Sian Berry AM, Green London Assembly Member and Camden councillor, calls for an end to the use of the tax evasion technique known as ‘box shifting’.

EG RADIUS

MPs call for ban on ‘box shifting’ business rates loophole

More than 30 MPs have urged the government to ban controversial “box shifting” methods, which allow landlords to exploit

LOCALGOV

‘Box shifting’ loophole costing councils £250m a year

Councils in England could save £250m annually if a legal loophole that enables landlords to avoid business rates was closed, according to the campaign Ban Box Shifting.

OPEN LETTER

End Rates Avoidance

Dear Government,

We, the undersigned, are writing to express our support for the campaign to End Rates Avoidance in England and save our councils an estimated £300 million annually.

This is an important matter that affects our communities and public services, and we believe it is time to take decisive action as we approach the closing date (18 Feb) of another consultation on the subject.   

A shake-up – but still no clampdown

Yes, there has been a recent shake-up of the business rates system… and yet there’s also been a wholesale failure to clamp down on the widespread “empty rates” avoidance practices that are costing our councils and communities so dearly. These include:

  •  Box shifting
  •  Fake places of workshop
  •  Snail farms

In each case, by exploiting a gaping legal loophole that still exists in our business rates system, landlords and multi-chain operators are able to trigger a three- or six-month rates-free period, and so drain vital funds from our local authorities. 

Counting the cost – and a clear solution

It is estimated that these practices cost England’s councils around £300 million per year, a sum that could be used to build 2,000 council homes, fund 150,000 hospital beds, or establish 12 brand new secondary schools.

It is time for England to follow in the footsteps of Scotland and Wales, both of whom have already passed legislation to address this issue. We are urging the Government to consider our End Rates Avoidance six-point manifesto: 

  1. Extend the ‘trigger’ period of occupation from 3 months to 6 months. So that relief, as in Wales, only kicks in after 6 months of genuine, continuous use, not short-term or token occupation.
  2. Give councils greater powers in deciding when empty rates relief can legitimately be granted, like Scotland. (And perhaps appoint an independent watchdog.)
  3. Put a one-year upper limit on avoidance and properties left in limbo because of insolvent tenants.
  4. Remove the ‘snail sham’ option in non-agricultural space (occupiers sometimes put snail farms or other similar species to claim a space is exempt as an agricultural space).
  5. Close the ‘fake place of worship’ loophole (by limiting the rates exemption to genuine places of worship, not temporary or fabricated claims.)
  6. Promote ethical rates mitigation. By restricting charity relief to genuine charities, and thereby supporting the ethical use of empty property in a way that protects public funds, and benefits communities.

By extending the occupation period required for rates exemption and granting councils more authority to decide when relief can be provided, we can prevent businesses from exploiting loopholes for financial gain. 

Furthermore, implementing a one-year time limit on avoidance and removing sham options will provide additional safeguards against fraudulent practices.

An ethical solution – and a call to take action

We also advocate for the promotion of ethical rates mitigation, which involves offering rent-free spaces to charities. 

This sustainable solution benefits local communities, landlords, and charities, and is already recognised by some councils’ estates teams as a legitimate means to save money and support communities.

We firmly stand behind the End Rates Avoidance initiative and urge the Government to take action in addressing the issue of business rates avoidance. 

By doing so, we can save our councils millions of pounds, which can then be reinvested in vital public services for the betterment of our communities.

Sincerely,


ACTION

Want to bring an end to a loophole that’s costing your council and your community? Here’s how.

If you want to help us bring an end to this costly legal loophole, and also to the widespread rates-avoiding schemes it has given rise to, resulting in a loss of millions of pounds going to our councils and communities, this is how.

Send a message to your local MP or councillor(s) using WriteToThem.com

Insert your post code and use the automated form – however, please note:

If you copy and paste directly from our proposed messaging, this will be picked up and your message may not be accepted. 

We recommend summarising or using some of the key points we have shared below in your messaging – however, as mentioned, please don’t copy + paste directly.

  • Because of gaping loopholes that remain in our business rates system, some property owners and commercial landlords are resorting to unethical practices, such as snail farms and fake places of worship, to trigger “empty rates” avoidance.
  • These unethical rates-avoiding schemes are costing our councils around £300 million annually.
  • England’s Government should extend the occupation period for rates exemption from three months to six months (like Scotland and Wales).
  • We also ask that new discretionary powers are given, either to councils and/or to an independent watchdog, to ensure exemptions are ONLY granted to deserving cases.
  • Ethical rates mitigation enables councils to offer organisations and charities support while also supporting their community.
  • The campaign ‘End Rates Avoidance’ has an Open Letter for Government requesting that new steps are taken to shore up the loopholes in the current Business Rates system.

MPs & Councillors That Have Already Signed

Issy Cooke – (Greenwich) – Labour

Varlene Alexander – (Ealing) – Labour

Anthony Molloy – (Brent) – Labour

Yusuf Mukhtar – (Barking) – Labour

Andree Frieze – (Richmond) – Green

James Beckles – (Newham) – Labour

Carolyn Corben – (Newham) – Labour

Rob Nunney – (Manchester) – Green

Richard Silvester – (Bolton) – Labour

Sian Berry – (Camden) – Green

David Jenkins – (Leeds) – Labour

Paul Wray – (Leeds) – Labour

Kevin Ritchie – (Leeds) – Labour

Chloe Goldsmith – (Brighton) – Green

Alistair Chisholm – (Newcastle) – Labour

Alastair Binnie-Lubbock – (Hackney) – Green

Mark Chatfield – (Rutland) – Lib Dem

Graham Minshaw – (Cumberland) – Labour

Sara Muldowney – (Thurrock) – Labour

Megan Wright – (Bracknell Forest) – Labour

Joe Reilly – (New Forest) – Independent


Mike Stonard – (Norwich) – Labour

Paul Gibson – (Sunderland) – Lib Dem

Ashan Jeeawon – (Rother) – Independent

Minesh Parekh – (Sheffield) – Labour

Tim Wye – (Bristol) – Green

Vera Rider – (Cleveland) – Independent

Jo Bird – (Wirral) – Green

Andy Ketchin – (Exeter) – Green

Michael Carthew – (Solihull) – Lib Dem

Judith Grier – (Wirral) – Green

Tess Read – (Exeter) – Green

Andrew Brown – (Bristol) – Lib Dem

Kerry Pickett – (Brighton) – Green

Ruth George – (Derbyshire) – Labour

Jacob Taylor – (Brighton) – Labour

Tim Smith – (Rutland) – Lib Dem

Lucy Bywater – (Bedfordshire) – Green

Darren Hayday – (Buckinghamshire) – Independent

Mark Howard – (Windsor and Maidenhead) – Lib Dem

Gurch Singh – (Windsor and Maidenhead) – Lib Dem

Louis Stark – Herefordshire Council – Liberal Democrats

Geoff Brodie – (Isle of Wight) – Independent Labour

Graham Baker – (Blackpool) – Conservatives

Graham Chapman – (Nottingham) – Labour

Zoe Garbett – (Hackney and London Mayoral Candidate for the Green Party 2024) – Green Party

Paul Bidwell – (Bracknell Forest) – Labour

Ria Patel – (Croydon) – Green Party

Nick Morphet – (Northumberland) – Green Party

Caritas Charles – (North Somerset) – Independent

Oliver Walters – (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) – Lib Dem

Joe Lever – (Isle of Wight) – Green

Imogen Shepherd – Dubey (Wokingham) – Lib Dem

Charles Adams – (Bassetlaw) – Labour

Tracy Adams – (Devon) – Labour

Carol Whitton – (Devon) – Labour

Janice Johnson – (Rossendale) – Labour

James Lawrence – (Epsom & Ewell) – Lib Dem

Gill Westcott – (Mid-Devon) – Green

Anthony Skuse – (Wokingham) – Labour

Don Birch – (Norfolk) – Lib Dem

Alasdair Bruce – (East Devon) – Independent

Neil Buttle – (Derbyshire Dales) – Green

Simon Lytton – (Cherwell) – Lib Dem

Peter Lamb – (Crawley) – Labour

Karen Lewing – (Worcester) – Green

Mark Chilton – (Chichester) – Lib Dem

Graham Simpkins – (Westmorland & Furness) – Lib Dem

Neil Hughes – (Westmorland & Furness) – Lib Dem

Danny Lee – (Winchester) – Green 

Michele Gibson – (Spelthorne) – Lib Dem 

Richard Kirkby-Taylor – (Colchester) – Green 

Max Wilkinson – (Cheltenham) – Lib Dem 

Roger Lees – (South Staffordshire) – Conservative 

Ian Middleton – (Oxfordshire) – Green 

Alison Owen – (Barbegh) – Labour 

Donna Richardson – (Southend) – Labour 

Maureen McKay – (East Ayrshire) – Labour 

Theresa Burton – (Runnymede) – Lib Dem

John Turley – (Worthing) – Labour

Sue Mallender – (Rushcliffe) – Green

Angela Lawrence – (West Lindsey) – Conservative

Adam Monk – (South Gloucestershire) – Labour

Marina Asvachin  – (Devon County Council) – Labour

Maximilian Czekalski – (Woolston) – Labour

Sophie Bell – (Milton Keynes) – Lib Dem

Tony Gould – (Ipswich) – Conservative

Alec Sandiford – (Stafford) – Lib Dem

Cathy Morgan – (Sevenoaks) – Conservative

Frances Victory – (Malvern Hills) – Green

Stephen Thompson – (Maidstone) – Green

Andrew McDermid – (Forest of Dean) – Green

David Moore – (Newark & Sherwood) – Independent

Vikki Slade – (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) – Lib Dem

Sarah Pankhurst – (Independent) – Fareham

Ian James – (East Hampshire) – Green

Ros Jackson – (East Lindsey) – Labour

Nick Cox – (East Hertfordshire) – Green

Total Councillors Signed = 100

Sign our open letter